Skip to content

Lazy portfolios compared: returns, risk and backtests

Ten well-known portfolios you can build with a few ETFs, tested over the same years: return, volatility, maximum drawdown and worst year. Updated daily.

Data updated October 2026

PortfolioCAGRVolatilityMax drawdownSharpeWorst year
Permanent Portfolio+27.9%84.3%−17.5%0.452022: −12.5%
Golden Butterfly Portfolio+26.3%66.6%−19.5%0.482022: −13.3%
100% Stocks+16.5%17.2%−25.4%0.822022: −19.5%
Warren Buffett 90/10 Portfolio+15.7%15.0%−22.5%0.862022: −16.7%
All Weather Portfolio+12.7%26.4%−23.8%0.452022: −19.2%
Core Four Portfolio+11.4%13.0%−24.4%0.682022: −18.0%
60/40 Portfolio+9.9%11.0%−21.6%0.662022: −17.0%
Three-Fund Portfolio+9.0%10.4%−22.3%0.612022: −16.3%
David Swensen Portfolio+8.7%11.5%−24.1%0.542022: −18.4%
Coffeehouse Portfolio+8.0%10.6%−20.1%0.522022: −14.1%

Backtest with total-return ETF prices (dividends reinvested), rebalanced to target weights on the first trading day of each year. No fees, taxes or currency effects; first and last years are partial. Past results do not predict future returns.

Growth of $10,000, all portfolios

$20,000$40,000202120222023202420252026
Permanent PortfolioGolden Butterfly Portfolio100% StocksWarren Buffett 90/10 PortfolioAll Weather PortfolioCore Four Portfolio60/40 PortfolioThree-Fund PortfolioDavid Swensen PortfolioCoffeehouse Portfolio