Two-Fund Portfolio: backtest, returns and drawdowns
One fund for the whole world’s stocks and one for bonds, 60/40.
Data updated October 2026
Created by: Bogleheads
Allocation
| Asset class | ETF used in the backtest | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| World stocks | ACWI | 60% |
| US aggregate bonds | BND | 40% |
- Stocks 60%
- Bonds 40%
From October 2011 to October 2026 the Two-Fund Portfolio returned 7.7% a year on average, with annual volatility of 10.1%. Its deepest fall was 22.3%, from November 2021 to October 2022, recovered in about 28 months.
Its best year was 2019 (+19.5%) and its worst 2022 (−16.3%).
Over the same period 100% US stocks returned 14.3% a year with a maximum fall of 35.0%.
Key figures
- Annual return (CAGR)
- +7.7%
- Annual volatility
- 10.1%
- Maximum drawdown
- −22.3%
- Recovery time
- 28 months
- Sharpe
- 0.64
- Sortino
- 0.89
- Worst year
- 2022: −16.3%
- Positive years
- 11/14
Growth of $10,000
Drawdowns
Returns by calendar year
| Year | Two-Fund Portfolio | 60/40 Portfolio | 100% Stocks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026(partial) | +6.8% | +6.9% | +12.7% |
| 2025 | +16.3% | +13.0% | +17.0% |
| 2024 | +11.0% | +14.8% | +23.8% |
| 2023 | +15.6% | +17.9% | +26.1% |
| 2022 | −16.3% | −16.9% | −19.5% |
| 2021 | +10.4% | +14.6% | +25.7% |
| 2020 | +12.8% | +15.4% | +20.7% |
| 2019 | +19.5% | +21.9% | +30.7% |
| 2018 | −5.4% | −3.1% | −5.3% |
| 2017 | +16.0% | +14.2% | +21.4% |
| 2016 | +6.0% | +8.3% | +12.1% |
| 2015 | −1.1% | +0.2% | −0.1% |
| 2014 | +4.6% | +9.7% | +12.2% |
| 2013 | +12.6% | +18.2% | +31.8% |
| 2012 | +11.6% | +10.4% | +14.7% |
| 2011(partial) | +1.5% | +3.1% | +4.1% |
History
- Created by
- Bogleheads community
- Who
- Followers of Vanguard founder John Bogle
- Year
- 2008
- Source
- Bogleheads forum and wiki
- Funds in the backtest
- 2
Once a single fund covering the whole world’s stock market became available – Vanguard Total World Stock (VT) launched in 2008 – the Bogleheads’ three-fund idea could shrink to two: one global stock fund and one bond fund.
The global fund holds companies in proportion to their market value, so the US weight follows the market (around 60% in recent years) without the investor having to choose it. The 60/40 split tested here is a common balanced version.
Strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
- Two funds for the whole world
- Country weights adjust automatically with the market
- Very low cost
Weaknesses
- US bonds only on the bond side
- Stocks and bonds can fall together, as in 2022
- No real assets
How it works
Let a global fund set the country weights, and choose only the split between stocks and bonds.
Backtest with total-return ETF prices (dividends reinvested), rebalanced to target weights on the first trading day of each year. Where a Vanguard fund has a short price history in our data, an iShares fund on the same market is used (for example ITOT for VTI, IVV for VOO). No fees, taxes or currency effects; first and last years are partial. Past results do not predict future returns.
Questions
Who created the Two-Fund Portfolio?
Bogleheads community (followers of Vanguard founder John Bogle), 2008. Source: Bogleheads forum and wiki.
What is the Two-Fund Portfolio?
One fund for the whole world’s stocks and one for bonds, 60/40. Allocation: 60% world stocks, 40% us aggregate bonds. Created by: Bogleheads.
What is the Two-Fund Portfolio return?
In the backtest from October 2011 to October 2026 it returned 7.7% a year on average, with a maximum drawdown of 22.3%. US dollars, before fees and taxes.
How often should it be rebalanced?
The backtest rebalances once a year back to the target weights. Rebalancing more often changes little and adds costs; some investors rebalance only when a weight drifts beyond a threshold.
What was the worst drawdown of the Two-Fund Portfolio?
22.3%, from November 2021 to October 2022; it took about 28 months to get back to the previous high.
Other lazy portfolios
- How to hedge a portfolioGuide
- 60/40 PortfolioCAGR +9.5%
- Golden Butterfly PortfolioCAGR +7.2%
- Three-Fund PortfolioCAGR +8.2%
- Coffeehouse PortfolioCAGR +7.5%
- Ivy PortfolioCAGR +7.4%
- 7Twelve PortfolioCAGR +6.5%
- Ultimate Buy and Hold PortfolioCAGR +6.7%
- Talmud PortfolioCAGR +8.0%
- Pinwheel PortfolioCAGR +7.6%
- All lazy portfoliosFull comparison
- Versione italiana
Source: MarketStack end-of-day prices. Historical and educational content: not a forecast and not investment advice. MEDGE Capital does not recommend buying or selling any instrument. Risk disclaimer.