Skip to content

Nasdaq-100: returns, drawdowns and futures positioning

The 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, weighted by market value with limits on the biggest names. Technology, communication services and consumer companies make up most of it.

Data updated October 2026

Measured through QQQ, total return in US dollarsData from October 2006

$10,000 in the Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) from October 2006

$199,872

+1899% in total, +16.2% a year on average, with dividends reinvested, in US dollars.

$0$100k$200k200720142021−53% fall
Calendar years with a gain

16 of 19

Best 2023, +54.9%. Worst 2008, −41.7%.

Deepest fall

−53.4%

Oct 2007 to Nov 2008. Back to the previous high 3.1 years after the peak.

Annual volatility

22.1%

How much returns swing around their average. Worst single month: −15.6%.

At the last close

5.4% below its high

October 19, 2026.

Returns to October 2026

1 year

QQQ+19.5%
SPY+16.6%

3 years

a year

QQQ+26.6%
SPY+23.1%

5 years

a year

QQQ+14.5%
SPY+12.7%

10 years

a year

QQQ+20.6%
SPY+15.4%

Since 2006

a year

QQQ+16.2%

Total return to the last close, dividends reinvested. Periods longer than a year are annualised. SPY is SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, shown for reference.

What holding the Nasdaq-100 was like

Every stretch of 1, 3, 5 and 10 years since October 2006, starting at each month-end. The bar runs from the worst stretch to the best; the mark is the middle one. Held for 10 years, the Nasdaq-100 never lost money: the worst stretch still returned +11.3% a year.

Held 1 year

229 periods

Worst −43.1%Middle +20.2%Best +68.7%

86% of periods ended with a gain

Held 3 years

205 periods, a year

Worst −3.4%Middle +17.6%Best +38.1%

96% of periods ended with a gain

Held 5 years

181 periods, a year

Worst +4.1%Middle +17.7%Best +28.4%

100% of periods ended with a gain

Held 10 years

121 periods, a year

Worst +11.3%Middle +18.3%Best +22.9%

100% of periods ended with a gain

Falls and recoveries

-40%-20%0%200720142021−53% · 2008−35% · 2022

How far the Nasdaq-100 was below its previous high, week by week.

The 5 deepest falls of 10% or more
FallFrom the high ofTo the low ofFalling forBack to the high
−53.4%Oct 2007Nov 200813 monthsJan 2011, 3.2 years later
−34.6%Nov 2021Oct 202211 monthsDec 2023, 2.1 years later
−28.0%Feb 2020Mar 20201 monthsJun 2020, 4 months later
−19.4%Jul 2018Jan 20196 monthsApr 2019, 9 months later
−17.5%Feb 2025Apr 20252 monthsJun 2025, 4 months later

Year by year

The Nasdaq-100 ended 16 of 19 full calendar years higher. The average gain in an up year was +27.3%, the average loss in a down year −24.8%.

YearQQQSPY
2026 YTD+17.3%+13.3%
2025+20.8%+17.7%
2024+25.6%+24.9%
2023+54.9%+26.2%
2022−32.6%−18.2%
2021+27.4%+28.7%
2020+48.6%+18.3%
2019+39.0%+31.2%
2018−0.1%−4.6%
2017+32.7%+21.7%
2016+7.1%+12.0%
YearQQQSPY
2015+9.4%+1.2%
2014+19.2%+13.5%
2013+36.6%+32.3%
2012+18.1%+16.0%
2011+3.4%+1.9%
2010+19.9%+15.1%
2009+54.7%+26.4%
2008−41.7%−36.8%
2007+19.0%+5.1%
2006+2.9%—

YTD: from 1 January to the last close. 2006 starts at the first price, October 2006.

Example: $500 a month for 10 years

Put in from Nov 2016

$60,000

Worth at the last close

$173,269 +189%

At no month-end was the account worth less than the money put in.

Try your own amount and dates
$0k$100k201720212025
Value of the accountMoney put in

Invested at each month-start, dividends reinvested, before trading costs and taxes.

Who holds E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures

Net positions by type of trader in the CFTC Traders in Financial Futures report of October 20, 2026 (positions as of Tuesday, published on Friday). The dot shows where each net position sits between its most short and most long of the past year.

Leveraged funds

Hedge funds and CTAs

84

Net long 950

contracts, 0.3% of open interest · +12,543 on the week

Most shortMost long

Asset managers

Pension funds, insurers, mutual funds

65

Net long 77,790

contracts, 28.6% of open interest · +2,467 on the week

Most shortMost long

Dealers

Banks and market makers

10

Net short 94,122

contracts, 34.5% of open interest · −16,190 on the week

Most shortMost long
0%202420252026
Leveraged fundsAsset managersDealers

Net position as a share of open interest, weekly, last three years. Above zero: net long.

Nasdaq-100 COT report: the full history and weekly changes

ETFs that track the Nasdaq-100

Fund1 year5 years, a year10 years, a yearCurrency
QQQInvesco QQQ Trust+19.5%+14.5%+20.6%USD
QQQMInvesco NASDAQ 100 ETF+19.6%+14.6%—USD
EQQQInvesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF (Dist)+26.0%+15.0%+19.6%EUR
CSNDXiShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)+26.3%+15.4%+20.2%EUR

Total returns with dividends reinvested, each in its trading currency, to the last close. Funds in different currencies are not directly comparable.

Questions

What has the Nasdaq-100 returned a year?

Measured through QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust), with dividends reinvested: +16.2% a year from October 2006 to October 2026. Over the last 10 years +20.6% a year, over the last 12 months +19.5%. Past returns do not predict future returns.

What was the biggest fall in the Nasdaq-100 since 2006?

−53.4% from October 2007 to November 2008, measured on QQQ with dividends reinvested; it was back at the previous high about 37 months after the peak. Falls before 2006 are outside this history.

Has the Nasdaq-100 ever lost money over 10 years?

Of the 121 10-year periods since October 2006, none ended with a loss; the worst returned +11.3% a year and the best +22.9% a year.

Are hedge funds long or short Nasdaq-100 futures?

Leveraged funds (hedge funds and CTAs) held a net long position of 950 contracts in E-mini Nasdaq-100 futures (0.3% of open interest), in the upper part of its one-year range. CFTC report of October 20, 2026.

Which ETFs track the Nasdaq-100?

Among the funds MEDGE follows: QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust), QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF), EQQQ (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF (Dist)), CSNDX (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (Acc)).

Related

Source: MarketStack end-of-day prices of QQQ, total return with dividends reinvested; CFTC Traders in Financial Futures (futures only). Figures are historical and descriptive; they are not forecasts and not investment advice. MEDGE Capital does not recommend buying or selling any instrument. Risk disclaimer.