SCHP vs IBCI: returns, risk and drawdowns compared
Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF against iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (Acc), over the same 16 years (September 2010 to October 2026) with dividends reinvested.
Data updated October 2026
From September 2010 to October 2026, SCHP returned 1.5% a year and IBCI 1.3% a year on average, so SCHP came out ahead by 0.3% a year. IBCI was the more volatile of the two (6.0% against 5.1% a year), and the deepest falls from a month-end high were 17.0% for SCHP and 12.8% for IBCI.
The correlation of monthly returns was 0.59: they moved together only in part. Over 159 rolling 3-year periods, SCHP did better in 39% and IBCI in 61%.
SCHP trades in USD and IBCI in EUR: each return is in its own currency, so part of the gap reflects the move of the euro against the dollar.
Side by side
| SCHP | IBCI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual return (CAGR) | +1.5% | +1.3% |
| Total return | +28% | +23% |
| Annual volatility | 5.1% | 6.0% |
| Maximum drawdown (month-end) | −17.0% | −12.8% |
| Worst month | −7.0% | −6.8% |
| Best month | +4.8% | +6.1% |
| Positive months | 60% | 56% |
| Best year | 2011: +11.8% | 2012: +10.7% |
| Worst year | 2022: −14.9% | 2022: −9.6% |
| 1-year return | −1.5% | −1.6% |
| 5 years, a year | −1.2% | −0.8% |
| 10 years, a year | +1.0% | +0.9% |
| Trading currency | USD | EUR |
First nine rows: the same 194 months for both funds. Trailing returns: to each fund’s last close.
Growth of 10,000: SCHP vs IBCI
Returns by calendar year
| Year | SCHP | IBCI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +6.8% | +0.8% |
| 2024 | +0.9% | +0.1% |
| 2023 | +2.3% | +5.6% |
| 2022 | −14.9% | −9.6% |
| 2021 | +3.6% | +6.2% |
| 2020 | +10.2% | +2.7% |
| 2019 | +7.4% | +6.5% |
| 2018 | −2.7% | −1.7% |
| 2017 | +2.0% | +1.1% |
| 2016 | +3.9% | +3.6% |
| 2015 | −1.9% | +0.7% |
| 2014 | +3.4% | +5.4% |
| 2013 | −9.2% | −4.2% |
| 2012 | +5.7% | +10.7% |
| 2011 | +11.8% | −1.2% |
How the figures are calculated
Total return in the fund’s trading currency, from end-of-day prices with dividends reinvested on the ex-date. The fund’s own ongoing charges are already reflected in its price; trading costs, taxes and currency conversion are not included. Past returns do not predict future returns.
The comparison uses only the months in which both funds have prices, so the figures cover the same period even when one fund is older.
Questions
Which has returned more, SCHP or IBCI?
From September 2010 to October 2026, SCHP returned +1.5% a year and IBCI +1.3% a year, with dividends reinvested, each in its own trading currency (USD and EUR). Over rolling 3-year periods SCHP did better in 39% of cases. Past returns do not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, SCHP or IBCI?
Over the same months annual volatility was 5.1% for SCHP and 6.0% for IBCI; the deepest fall from a month-end high was 17.0% and 12.8%, and the worst single month −7.0% and −6.8%.
How correlated are SCHP and IBCI?
The correlation of their monthly returns was 0.59: they moved together only in part. Combining them has historically given some diversification.
More comparisons
Source: MarketStack end-of-day prices, total return with dividends reinvested. Figures are historical and descriptive; they are not forecasts and not investment advice. MEDGE Capital does not recommend buying or selling any instrument. Risk disclaimer.