EIMI vs XMME: returns, risk and drawdowns compared
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) against Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1C, over the same 9 years (July 2017 to October 2026) with dividends reinvested.
Data updated October 2026
From July 2017 to October 2026, EIMI returned 7.9% a year and XMME 7.6% a year on average, so EIMI came out ahead by 0.3% a year. XMME was the more volatile of the two (15.0% against 14.7% a year), and the deepest falls from a month-end high were 22.7% for EIMI and 23.7% for XMME.
The correlation of monthly returns was 0.99: they moved almost in lockstep. Over 77 rolling 3-year periods, EIMI did better in 73% and XMME in 27%.
Side by side
| EIMI | XMME | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual return (CAGR) | +7.9% | +7.6% |
| Total return | +103% | +98% |
| Annual volatility | 14.7% | 15.0% |
| Maximum drawdown (month-end) | −22.7% | −23.7% |
| Worst month | −14.4% | −13.7% |
| Best month | +11.5% | +11.7% |
| Positive months | 57% | 59% |
| Best year | 2019: +20.2% | 2019: +21.9% |
| Worst year | 2022: −15.2% | 2022: −15.0% |
| 1-year return | +21.2% | +22.2% |
| 5 years, a year | +7.7% | +7.6% |
| 10 years, a year | +8.1% | — |
| Trading currency | EUR | EUR |
First nine rows: the same 112 months for both funds. Trailing returns: to each fund’s last close.
Growth of 10,000: EIMI vs XMME
Returns by calendar year
| Year | EIMI | XMME |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | +17.2% | +18.7% |
| 2024 | +14.1% | +13.8% |
| 2023 | +7.8% | +5.9% |
| 2022 | −15.2% | −15.0% |
| 2021 | +7.8% | +4.8% |
| 2020 | +7.8% | +6.6% |
| 2019 | +20.2% | +21.9% |
| 2018 | −10.6% | −11.2% |
How the figures are calculated
Total return in the fund’s trading currency, from end-of-day prices with dividends reinvested on the ex-date. The fund’s own ongoing charges are already reflected in its price; trading costs, taxes and currency conversion are not included. Past returns do not predict future returns.
The comparison uses only the months in which both funds have prices, so the figures cover the same period even when one fund is older.
Questions
Which has returned more, EIMI or XMME?
From July 2017 to October 2026, EIMI returned +7.9% a year and XMME +7.6% a year, with dividends reinvested. Over rolling 3-year periods EIMI did better in 73% of cases. Past returns do not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, EIMI or XMME?
Over the same months annual volatility was 14.7% for EIMI and 15.0% for XMME; the deepest fall from a month-end high was 22.7% and 23.7%, and the worst single month −14.4% and −13.7%.
How correlated are EIMI and XMME?
The correlation of their monthly returns was 0.99: they moved almost in lockstep. Holding both adds little diversification compared with holding one.
More comparisons
Source: MarketStack end-of-day prices, total return with dividends reinvested. Figures are historical and descriptive; they are not forecasts and not investment advice. MEDGE Capital does not recommend buying or selling any instrument. Risk disclaimer.